DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Tofas Siena vs 2002 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tofas Siena

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TofasMakeCitroen
SienaModelC3
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

12,9 s0–100 km/h15,4 s
164 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1372 ccEngine displacement1398 cc
71 HPPower68 HP
110 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
48 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption5,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,8 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 HTyre size165/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4100 mmLength3850 mm
1626 mmWidth1667 mm
1445 mmHeight1529 mm
1025 KgWeight1022 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2460 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Tofas Siena and 2002 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tofas Siena leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…