DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Tofas Siena vs 2000 Zastava Yugo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Zastava Yugo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TofasMakeZastava
SienaModelYugo
1998Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

12,9 s0–100 km/h14,5 s
164 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1372 ccEngine displacement1372 cc
71 HPPower71 HP
110 NmTorque106 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
48 ltFuel tank48 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 HTyre size165/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4100 mmLength3930 mm
1626 mmWidth1660 mm
1445 mmHeight1410 mm
1025 KgWeight960 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Tofas Siena and 2000 Zastava Yugo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Zastava Yugo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…