DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Tofas Sahin vs 2000 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TofasMakeRenault
SahinModelClio
1994Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

13,1 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
170 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1581 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
130 NmTorque114 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
6,55 ltAverage consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13 STyre size175/70 R13; 175/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4316 mmLength4150 mm
1642 mmWidth1639 mm
1437 mmHeight1416 mm
985 KgWeight940 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2472 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Tofas Sahin and 2000 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…