DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Tofas Sahin vs 2000 Nissan Micra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Micra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TofasMakeNissan
SahinModelMicra
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

13,5 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
162 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1372 ccEngine displacement1348 cc
82 HPPower82 HP
113 NmTorque108 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank42 lt
—Urban consumption7,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/80 R13 HTyre size165/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4316 mmLength3746 mm
1642 mmWidth1595 mm
1437 mmHeight1440 mm
935 KgWeight865 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Tofas Sahin and 2000 Nissan Micra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Micra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…