DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Tofas Palio vs 2003 Perodua Kenari Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Kenari

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.25–43.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TofasMakePerodua
PalioModelKenari
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,5 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
153 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1242 ccEngine displacement989 cc
60 HPPower56 HP
102 NmTorque88 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
48 ltFuel tank40 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption4,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size155/65 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3775 mmLength3460 mm
1626 mmWidth1475 mm
1445 mmHeight1665 mm
935 KgWeight845 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Tofas Palio and 2003 Perodua Kenari approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Kenari leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…