DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Tofas Marea vs 1996 Honda Sm-x Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Sm-x

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TofasMakeHonda
MareaModelSm-x
1996Model year1996
—Body typeMinivan
—Seats4
—Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1973 cc
154 HPPower140 HP
186 NmTorque186 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption8,62 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,35 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears4
—Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length3935 mm
—Width1695 mm
—Height1735 mm
—Weight1370 Kg
—Wheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Tofas Marea and 1996 Honda Sm-x approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Sm-x leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…