DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Tofas Marea vs 1996 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TofasMakeMazda
MareaModel323
1996Model year1996
—Body typeHatchback
—Seats5
—Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed191 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1840 cc
105 HPPower114 HP
200 NmTorque157 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Average consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size185/65 R14 H
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4245 mm
—Width1695 mm
—Height1355 mm
—Weight1115 Kg
—Wheelbase2605 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Tofas Marea and 1996 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…