DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Tofas Marea vs 1996 Mitsubishi Colt Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Colt

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TofasMakeMitsubishi
MareaModelColt
1996Model year1996
—Body typeHatchback
—Seats5
—Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,7 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1581 ccEngine displacement1597 cc
103 HPPower113 HP
142 NmTorque153 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Average consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size175/70 R13
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length3955 mm
—Width1690 mm
—Height1365 mm
—Weight959 Kg
—Wheelbase2440 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Tofas Marea and 1996 Mitsubishi Colt approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Colt leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…