2000 • Tofas
Marea
Tofas Marea 1.6 i 16V SX (103 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
2000 Tofas Marea vs 2000 Chevrolet Tracker Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Chevrolet
Tracker
Chevrolet Tracker 1.6 i 16V 4WD (97 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Tofas Marea
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
56.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Tofas MareaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
TofasMakeChevrolet
MareaModelTracker
2000Model year2000
—Body typeOff-road vehicle
—Seats5
—Doors3
Performance
Tofas MareaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
0 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1581 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
103 HPPower97 HP
142 NmTorque133 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Tofas MareaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank56 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Tofas MareaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
—Length3650 mm
—Width1630 mm
—Height1650 mm
—Weight1235 Kg
—Wheelbase2200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Tofas Marea and 2000 Chevrolet Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Tofas Marea leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableAudi A3 vs Tofas Marea2000 and 2000 model years
VSImage unavailableAudi A4 vs Tofas Marea2000 and 2000 model yearsVSImage unavailableChevrolet Tracker vs Tofas Marea2000 and 2000 model years
VSImage unavailableSuzuki Baleno vs Tofas Marea2000 and 2000 model years
VSImage unavailableSuzuki Cultus vs Tofas Marea2000 and 2000 model yearsComments are loading…