DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Tofas Kartal vs 2000 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mondeo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TofasMakeFord
KartalModelMondeo
1999Model year2000
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

13,5 s0–100 km/h12,7 s
168 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1581 ccEngine displacement1597 cc
96 HPPower95 HP
124 NmTorque142 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank61 lt
—Urban consumption10,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14 TTyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4396 mmLength4556 mm
1642 mmWidth1751 mm
1496 mmHeight1424 mm
1100 KgWeight1240 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2704 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Tofas Kartal and 2000 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…