DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Tofas Kartal vs 2013 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 9 points.

47.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TofasMakeRenault
KartalModelClio
2001Model year2013
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

13,9 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
160 km/hTop speed176 km/h
1585 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
81 HPPower90 HP
124 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption4,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,3 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption3,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6 EDC
185/70 R14 STyre size185/65 R15 88T; 195/55 R16 87H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4361 mmLength4267 mm
1642 mmWidth1732 mm
1496 mmHeight1445 mm
1060 KgWeight—
2490 mmWheelbase2589 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Tofas Kartal and 2013 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 9 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…