DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Tofas Doblo vs 2005 Zastava Yugo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Zastava Yugo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

39.5–40.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TofasMakeZastava
DobloModelYugo
2003Model year2005
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

18,9 s0–100 km/h20,1 s
142 km/hTop speed135 km/h
1242 ccEngine displacement903 cc
65 HPPower45 HP
102 NmTorque63 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank32 lt
—Urban consumption7,4 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
175/70 R14 TTyre size135/85 R13
YesABS—

Dimensions

4195 mmLength3490 mm
1714 mmWidth1540 mm
1800 mmHeight1340 mm
1190 KgWeight750 Kg
2566 mmWheelbase2150 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Tofas Doblo and 2005 Zastava Yugo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Zastava Yugo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…