DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Tofas 131 vs 2000 Tofas UNO Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tofas UNO

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Tofas 131SpecificationTofas UNO
TofasMakeTofas
131ModelUNO
1995Model year2000
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Tofas 131SpecificationTofas UNO
14,5 s0–100 km/h11,4 s
160 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1585 ccEngine displacement1372 cc
75 HPPower73 HP
124 NmTorque108 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Tofas 131SpecificationTofas UNO
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank42 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption—
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Tofas 131SpecificationTofas UNO
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 SR14Tyre size155/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Tofas 131SpecificationTofas UNO
4320 mmLength3689 mm
1630 mmWidth1562 mm
1440 mmHeight1425 mm
945 KgWeight820 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2362 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Tofas 131 and 2000 Tofas UNO approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tofas UNO leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…