DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Tofas 131 vs 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tofas 131

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–45.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TofasMakeMitsubishi
131ModelSpace Runner
1992Model year1992
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

14,5 s0–100 km/h17,8 s
160 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1585 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
75 HPPower82 HP
124 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
10,5 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 SR14Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4320 mmLength4270 mm
1630 mmWidth1695 mm
1440 mmHeight1665 mm
945 KgWeight1260 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2520 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Tofas 131 and 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tofas 131 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…