DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Tata Sumo vs 1998 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

51.5–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Tata SumoSpecificationMazda 323
TataMakeMazda
SumoModel323
1998Model year1998
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Tata SumoSpecificationMazda 323
—0–100 km/h12,2 s
106 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1948 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
68 HPPower90 HP
118 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Tata SumoSpecificationMazda 323
DieselFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
14 ltUrban consumption6,4 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
9,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Tata SumoSpecificationMazda 323
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Tata SumoSpecificationMazda 323
4450 mmLength4200 mm
1765 mmWidth1705 mm
2080 mmHeight1410 mm
1700 KgWeight1175 Kg
2400 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Tata Sumo and 1998 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…