DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Tata Sumo vs 1996 Seat Toledo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Toledo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

51.5–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TataMakeSeat
SumoModelToledo
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,7 s
106 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1948 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
68 HPPower90 HP
118 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
14 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
9,9 ltAverage consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R15Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4450 mmLength4321 mm
1765 mmWidth1662 mm
2080 mmHeight1421 mm
1700 KgWeight1080 Kg
2400 mmWheelbase2471 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Tata Sumo and 1996 Seat Toledo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Toledo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…