DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Tata Nano vs 2014 Renault Symbol Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tata Nano

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TataMakeRenault
NanoModelSymbol
2015Model year2014
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,1 s
105 km/hTop speed175 km/h
624 ccEngine displacement898 cc
38 HPPower90 HP
51 NmTorque135 Nm
2Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
24 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption6,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,4 lt
—Average consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—TransmissionManual
135/70 R12; 155/65 R12Tyre size15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3164 mmLength4348 mm
1750 mmWidth1733 mm
1652 mmHeight1517 mm
695-735 KgWeight998 kg
—Luggage capacity510 lt
2230 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Tata Nano

No additional feature records are available.

Renault SymbolDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Tata Nano and 2014 Renault Symbol approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tata Nano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…