DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Tata Indica vs 1998 Mazda 121 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tata Indica

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

39.5–38.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TataMakeMazda
IndicaModel121
2000Model year1998
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

17,0 s0–100 km/h19,0 s
140 km/hTop speed143 km/h
1405 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
49 HPPower50 HP
85 NmTorque97 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
37 ltFuel tank42 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13Tyre size165/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3660 mmLength3828 mm
1625 mmWidth1634 mm
1485 mmHeight1330 mm
1005 KgWeight930 Kg
2400 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Tata Indica and 1998 Mazda 121 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tata Indica leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…