DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Suzuki Vitara vs 1996 Toyota Corona Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Corona

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.5–55.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeToyota
VitaraModelCorona
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

130 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1974 cc
83 HPPower73 HP
168 NmTorque132 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption—
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/65 R16 STyre size175/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4125 mmLength4520 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1695 mmHeight1410 mm
1405 KgWeight1150 Kg
2480 mmWheelbase2580 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Suzuki Vitara and 1996 Toyota Corona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Corona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…