2004 • Suzuki
Vitara
Suzuki Vitara 1.9 TDI (5 dr) 2004Overall Score56.25/100
2004 Suzuki Vitara vs 2004 Mitsubishi L 200 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Mitsubishi
L 200
Mitsubishi L 200 2.0 i 2WD (95 Hp) 2004Overall Score55.5/100
WINNER
Suzuki Vitara
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Suzuki VitaraSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
SuzukiMakeMitsubishi
VitaraModelL 200
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
5Seats4
5Doors4
Performance
Suzuki VitaraSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
150 km/hTop speed142 km/h
1905 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
75 HPPower95 HP
135 NmTorque154 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Suzuki VitaraSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank75 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption—
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Suzuki VitaraSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R15Tyre size205/70 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Suzuki VitaraSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
4030 mmLength4500 mm
1630 mmWidth1655 mm
1695 mmHeight1570 mm
1405 KgWeight1380 Kg
2480 mmWheelbase2230 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Suzuki Vitara and 2004 Mitsubishi L 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Suzuki Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…