DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Suzuki Vitara vs 2000 Suzuki Vitara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Vitara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

42.25–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeSuzuki
VitaraModelVitara
1998Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

17,0 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
150 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1905 ccEngine displacement1905 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
135 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank42 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption9,4 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/80 R15Tyre size195/80 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3650 mmLength3650 mm
1630 mmWidth1630 mm
1665 mmHeight1665 mm
1230 KgWeight1230 Kg
2200 mmWheelbase2200 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Suzuki Vitara and 2000 Suzuki Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…