1999 • Suzuki
Vitara
Suzuki Vitara 1.9 D (ET) 1999Overall Score38.5/100
1999 Suzuki Vitara vs 2003 Volkswagen Caddy Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Volkswagen
Caddy
Volkswagen Caddy 2.0 SDI (70 Hp) 2003Overall Score37.5/100
WINNER
Suzuki Vitara
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
38.5–37.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Suzuki VitaraSpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
SuzukiMakeVolkswagen
VitaraModelCaddy
1999Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeMinivan
5Seats5/7
3Doors5
Performance
Suzuki VitaraSpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
17,0 s0–100 km/h20,5 s
137 km/hTop speed142 km/h
1905 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
75 HPPower70 HP
135 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Suzuki VitaraSpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
—Average consumption6,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Suzuki VitaraSpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Suzuki VitaraSpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
3630 mmLength4405 mm
1670 mmWidth1802 mm
1630 mmHeight1833 mm
1220 KgWeight1446-1567 Kg
2200 mmWheelbase2682 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Suzuki Vitara and 2003 Volkswagen Caddy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Suzuki Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…