DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Suzuki Vitara vs 2014 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeVolvo
VitaraModelV40
2015Model year2014
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1586 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
120 HPPower120 HP
156 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank62 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/60 R16; 215/55 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4175 mmLength4369 mm
1775 mmWidth1783 mm
1610 mmHeight1420 mm
1075 KgWeight1463 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2647 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Suzuki Vitara and 2014 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…