DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Suzuki Vitara vs 1996 Citroen Saxo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Vitara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.5–42.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeCitroen
VitaraModelSaxo
1995Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

15,0 s0–100 km/h18,3 s
144 km/hTop speed158 km/h
1589 ccEngine displacement1527 cc
80 HPPower57 HP
127 NmTorque95 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank45 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195 R15Tyre size165/70 R13
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3620 mmLength3718 mm
1630 mmWidth1595 mm
1665 mmHeight1368 mm
1020 KgWeight890 Kg
2200 mmWheelbase2385 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Suzuki Vitara and 1996 Citroen Saxo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…