DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Alfa Romeo 159 vs 2009 Cadillac BLS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 159

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeCadillac
159ModelBLS
2009Model year2009
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,7 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
235 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1742 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
200 HPPower175 HP
320 NmTorque265 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank58 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
225/50 R17; 235/45 R18; 235/40 ZR19Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4660 mmLength4680 mm
1828 mmWidth1752 mm
1417-1422 mmHeight1471 mm
1430 KgWeight—
2700 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Alfa Romeo 159 and 2009 Cadillac BLS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 159 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…