DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Suzuki Vitara vs 1990 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Vitara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.5–42.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeRenault
VitaraModelClio
1990Model year1990
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

15,0 s0–100 km/h15,4 s
144 km/hTop speed161 km/h
1589 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
80 HPPower64 HP
127 NmTorque118 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195 R15Tyre size165/70 R13
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3620 mmLength3773 mm
1630 mmWidth1640 mm
1665 mmHeight1417 mm
1020 KgWeight975 Kg
2200 mmWheelbase2472 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Suzuki Vitara and 1990 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…