DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 BMW 7 Serisi vs 1996 Saab 900 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 900

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

63.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeSaab
7 SerisiModel900
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

11,4 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
206 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2498 cc
143 HPPower170 HP
280 NmTorque227 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank68 lt
11,0 ltUrban consumption—
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,0 ltAverage consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4984 mmLength4637 mm
1862 mmWidth1711 mm
1435 mmHeight1436 mm
1710 KgWeight1345 Kg
2930 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 BMW 7 Serisi and 1996 Saab 900 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 900 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…