DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Suzuki Verona vs 2003 MG ZR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Suzuki VeronaSpecificationMG ZR
SuzukiMakeMG
VeronaModelZR
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

Suzuki VeronaSpecificationMG ZR
9,8 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
200 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
131 HPPower113 HP
181 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Suzuki VeronaSpecificationMG ZR
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank50 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
8,8 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Suzuki VeronaSpecificationMG ZR
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Suzuki VeronaSpecificationMG ZR
4770 mmLength4011 mm
1815 mmWidth1690 mm
1440 mmHeight1400 mm
1422 KgWeight1155 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2502 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Suzuki Verona and 2003 MG ZR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…