DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Suzuki Swift vs 2014 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Swift

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeVolvo
SwiftModelV40
2014Model year2014
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1586 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
136 HPPower120 HP
160 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank62 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
195/45 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3890 mmLength4369 mm
1695 mmWidth1783 mm
1510 mmHeight1420 mm
1115 KgWeight1463 Kg
2430 mmWheelbase2647 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Suzuki Swift and 2014 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Swift leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…