DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Suzuki Swift vs 2009 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Swift

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeVolvo
SwiftModelV50
2009Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1490 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
102 HPPower109 HP
133 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank52 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
—Average consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3695 mmLength4522 mm
1690 mmWidth1845 mm
1500 mmHeight1457 mm
1010 KgWeight1416 Kg
2380 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Suzuki Swift and 2009 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Swift leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…