2004 • Suzuki
Swift
Suzuki Swift 1.3 i 16V (92 Hp) 2004Overall Score47.25/100
2004 Suzuki Swift vs 2004 Volkswagen Polo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo 1.4 i 16V (75 Hp) 2004Overall Score47.25/100
RESULT
Tie
The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score.
47.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Suzuki SwiftSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
SuzukiMakeVolkswagen
SwiftModelPolo
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5
Performance
Suzuki SwiftSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
11,0 s0–100 km/h14,3 s
175 km/hTop speed166 km/h
1328 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
92 HPPower75 HP
116 NmTorque126 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Suzuki SwiftSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Suzuki SwiftSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
165/70 R14Tyre size215/40 R17 W
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Suzuki SwiftSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
3695 mmLength3911 mm
1690 mmWidth1671 mm
1500 mmHeight1537 mm
1000 KgWeight1101 Kg
2380 mmWheelbase2462 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Suzuki Swift and 2004 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score. The better choice therefore depends more heavily on priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance and equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…