2012 • Suzuki
Swift
Suzuki Swift 1.2 4AT (94Hp) 2012Overall Score50.25/100
2012 Suzuki Swift vs 2013 Suzuki Swift Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Suzuki
Swift
Suzuki Swift 1.2 (90 Hp) 2013Overall Score50.25/100
RESULT
Tie
The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score.
50.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Suzuki SwiftSpecificationSuzuki Swift
SuzukiMakeSuzuki
SwiftModelSwift
2012Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4+1Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Suzuki SwiftSpecificationSuzuki Swift
13,5 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
160 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1242 ccEngine displacement1242 cc
94 HPPower90 HP
118 NmTorque120 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Suzuki SwiftSpecificationSuzuki Swift
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank42 lt
6,8 ltUrban consumption4,9 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption4,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Suzuki SwiftSpecificationSuzuki Swift
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
175/65 R15; 185/55 R16Tyre size185/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Suzuki SwiftSpecificationSuzuki Swift
3850 mmLength3850 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1510 mmHeight1500 mm
1040 KgWeight1045 Kg
2430 mmWheelbase2430 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Suzuki Swift and 2013 Suzuki Swift approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score. The better choice therefore depends more heavily on priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance and equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…