2008 • Suzuki
Reno
Suzuki Reno 2.0i (128 Hp) 2008Overall Score62.5/100
2008 Suzuki Reno vs 2008 Volvo V50 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2008 • Volvo
V50
Volvo V50 2.0 D (136Hp) 2008Overall Score61.75/100
WINNER
Suzuki Reno
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–61.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Suzuki RenoSpecificationVolvo V50
SuzukiMakeVolvo
RenoModelV50
2008Model year2008
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Suzuki RenoSpecificationVolvo V50
—0–100 km/h9,6 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
128 HPPower136 HP
174 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Suzuki RenoSpecificationVolvo V50
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank52 lt
—Urban consumption7,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,6 lt
—Average consumption5,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Suzuki RenoSpecificationVolvo V50
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/55 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Suzuki RenoSpecificationVolvo V50
4295 mmLength4522 mm
1725 mmWidth1845 mm
1445 mmHeight1457 mm
—Weight1472 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2008 Suzuki Reno and 2008 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Suzuki Reno leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…