DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Suzuki Jimny vs 2008 Great Wall Peri Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Peri

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

45.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeGreat Wall
JimnyModelPeri
2008Model year2008
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
4Seats4
3Doors5

Performance

17,0 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
145 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1342 cc
86 HPPower88 HP
160 NmTorque115 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank35 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption7 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
205/70 R15Tyre size165/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3395 mmLength3548 mm
1475 mmWidth1580 mm
1660 mmHeight1544 mm
1050 KgWeight981 Kg
2250 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Suzuki Jimny and 2008 Great Wall Peri approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Peri leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…