DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Suzuki Jimny vs 2004 Smart Forfour Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Smart Forfour

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeSmart
JimnyModelForfour
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
4Seats4
3Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,5 s
140 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1493 cc
80 HPPower95 HP
104 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
40 ltFuel tank47 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption5,8 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption4,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/70 R15Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3625 mmLength3752 mm
1600 mmWidth1684 mm
1670 mmHeight1450 mm
1025 KgWeight965 Kg
2250 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Suzuki Jimny and 2004 Smart Forfour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Smart Forfour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…