DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Suzuki Grand Vitara vs 2003 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

45.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeRenault
Grand VitaraModelScenic
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

19,8 s0–100 km/h15,7 s
142 km/hTop speed162 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
87 HPPower80 HP
216 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
66 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption—
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4195 mmLength4169 mm
1780 mmWidth1719 mm
1685 mmHeight1675 mm
1395 KgWeight1365 Kg
2480 mmWheelbase2564 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Suzuki Grand Vitara and 2003 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…