DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Suzuki Grand Vitara vs 1998 Mitsubishi Space Runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

44.5–45.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeMitsubishi
Grand VitaraModelSpace Runner
1998Model year1998
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

19,8 s0–100 km/h17,8 s
142 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
87 HPPower82 HP
216 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
66 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
—Average consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R15Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4195 mmLength4270 mm
1780 mmWidth1695 mm
1685 mmHeight1665 mm
1395 KgWeight1260 Kg
2480 mmWheelbase2520 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Suzuki Grand Vitara and 1998 Mitsubishi Space Runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…