DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara vs 2004 Renault Trafic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Trafic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

45.5–46.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeRenault
Grand VitaraModelTrafic
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
4Seats9
3Doors4

Performance

15,2 s0–100 km/h14,9 s
142 km/hTop speed138 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
87 HPPower82 HP
216 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
56 ltFuel tank90 lt
—Urban consumption9,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,8 lt
—Average consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R15Tyre size195/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3865 mmLength4782 mm
1695 mmWidth1904 mm
1685 mmHeight1940 mm
1310 KgWeight1791 Kg
2200 mmWheelbase3098 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara and 2004 Renault Trafic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Trafic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…