DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara vs 2004 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Grand Vitara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–58.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeVolvo
Grand VitaraModelV50
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
—Seats5
—Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,6 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
128 HPPower136 HP
174 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank52 lt
—Urban consumption7,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,6 lt
—Average consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4522 mm
—Width1845 mm
—Height1457 mm
—Weight1472 Kg
—Wheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara and 2004 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Grand Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…