DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Suzuki Grand Vitara vs 2002 Rover 25 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeRover
Grand VitaraModel25
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
—Seats5
—Doors3/5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,1 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
128 HPPower113 HP
174 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank50 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
10,2 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

—Length3990 mm
—Width1688 mm
—Height1419 mm
—Weight1130 Kg
—Wheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Suzuki Grand Vitara and 2002 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…