DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Suzuki Grand Vitara vs 2002 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeMG
Grand VitaraModelZS
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
—Seats5
—Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
0 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
128 HPPower113 HP
174 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
10,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4520 mm
—Width1700 mm
—Height1390 mm
—Weight1225 Kg
—Wheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Suzuki Grand Vitara and 2002 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…