DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara vs 2004 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Grand Vitara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeMG
Grand VitaraModelZS
2004Model year2004
CabrioletBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

11,4 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
160 km/hTop speed19 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
128 HPPower117 HP
174 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank55 lt
12 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
—Average consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size205/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3865 mmLength4520 mm
1710 mmWidth1700 mm
1690 mmHeight1390 mm
1290 KgWeight1125 Kg
2200 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara and 2004 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Grand Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…