DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Suzuki Grand Vitara vs 2002 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Grand Vitara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

62.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeAudi
Grand VitaraModelA3
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
—Seats5
—Doors3/5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,0 s
0 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
109 HPPower100 HP
250 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption6,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4152 mm
—Width1735 mm
—Height1427 mm
—Weight1185 Kg
—Wheelbase2513 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Suzuki Grand Vitara and 2002 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Grand Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…