DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Suzuki Grand Vitara vs 2002 Chevrolet Tracker Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Tracker

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeChevrolet
Grand VitaraModelTracker
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
—Seats5
—Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
109 HPPower129 HP
250 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank56 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—Drivetrain4x4
—Gears5
—Tyre size195/75 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4060 mm
—Width1695 mm
—Height1690 mm
—Weight1355 Kg
—Wheelbase2480 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Suzuki Grand Vitara and 2002 Chevrolet Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…