DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Suzuki Grand Vitara vs 2002 Chevrolet Tracker Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Tracker

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeChevrolet
Grand VitaraModelTracker
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
—Seats5
—Doors3

Performance

0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
109 HPPower129 HP
250 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank56 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size195/75 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length3780 mm
—Width1694 mm
—Height1689 mm
—Weight1180 Kg
—Wheelbase2200 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Suzuki Grand Vitara and 2002 Chevrolet Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…