DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Suzuki Grand Vitara vs 2000 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Grand Vitara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeAudi
Grand VitaraModelA3
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,9 s
140 km/hTop speed189 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1595 cc
107 HPPower101 HP
144 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank55 lt
12 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
—Average consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4090 mmLength4152 mm
1700 mmWidth1735 mm
1690 mmHeight1427 mm
1270 KgWeight1090 Kg
2480 mmWheelbase2513 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Suzuki Grand Vitara and 2000 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Grand Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…