DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Suzuki Grand Vitara vs 2000 Chevrolet Tracker Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Grand Vitara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeChevrolet
Grand VitaraModelTracker
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

140 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
107 HPPower97 HP
144 NmTorque133 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank56 lt
12 ltUrban consumption14 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size195/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4090 mmLength3650 mm
1700 mmWidth1630 mm
1690 mmHeight1650 mm
1270 KgWeight1235 Kg
2480 mmWheelbase2200 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Suzuki Grand Vitara and 2000 Chevrolet Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Grand Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…