DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Suzuki Forenza vs 2008 Opel Antara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Antara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeOpel
ForenzaModelAntara
2008Model year2008
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,9 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2000 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
127 HPPower127 HP
0 NmTorque295 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank0 lt
—Urban consumption8,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,8 lt
—Average consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
—Tyre size225/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4575 mm
—Width1850 mm
—Height1704 mm
—Weight1805 Kg
—Wheelbase2707 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Suzuki Forenza and 2008 Opel Antara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Antara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…