DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Suzuki Forenza vs 2006 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mondeo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeFord
ForenzaModelMondeo
2006Model year2006
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,7 s
0 km/hTop speed195 km/h
2000 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
127 HPPower115 HP
0 NmTorque280 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank56 lt
—Urban consumption8,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,6 lt
—Average consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4731 mm
—Width1812 mm
—Height1429 mm
—Weight1498 Kg
—Wheelbase2754 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Suzuki Forenza and 2006 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…