DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Suzuki Forenza vs 2011 Ford S-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Forenza

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeFord
ForenzaModelS-Max
2006Model year2011
SedanBody typeMPV
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,8 s
175 km/hTop speed204 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
120 HPPower160 HP
0 NmTorque0 Nm

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption9,4 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
—Average consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/55 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4500 mmLength4903 mm
1725 mmWidth2154 mm
1445 mmHeight1660 mm
1250 KgWeight1598 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Suzuki Forenza and 2011 Ford S-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Forenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…